Monday, September 23, 2013

4

February 1, 2010    Taylor on Bernhard
Wonderful essay on visiting the house of Thomas Bernard by
Jonathan D Taylor
I'm going to paste in huge chunks from it right now.
Everything is ridiculous when one thinks of death, he said upon receiving Austria’s Förderungspreis für Literature in 1968
Take good care, Gambetti, not to visit the places associated with writers, poets and philosophers, because if you do you won’t understand them at all.
—Thomas Bernhard, Extinction
Real intellect does not know admiration.… People enter every church and every museum as though with a rucksack full of admiration, and for that reason they always have that revolting stooping way of walking which they all have in churches and museums, he said. I have never yet seen a person enter a church or a museum entirely normally, and the most distasteful thing is to watch those people in Knossos or in Agrigento, when they have arrived at the destination of their admiration journey, because the journeys these people take are nothing but admiration journeys.
—TB   Old Masters
I write only of interior landscapes, and the majority of people don’t see those: they see almost nothing that is “inside.” Because they always think that if something is internal, it’s obscure, and therefore they don’t see anything. I think I’ve never described a landscape in a book. I treat only concepts, by which I mean talking always of mountains or a city or roads, but how these appear—no, I have never described a landscape.
—Interview, 1981
Whatever is communicated can only be falsehood and falsification; hence it is only falsehoods and falsifications that are communicated. The aspiration for truth, like every other aspiration, is the quickest way to arrive at falsehoods and falsifications with regard to any state of affairs. And to write about a period of one’s life, no matter how remote or how recent, no matter how long or how short, means accumulating hundreds and thousands and millions of falsehoods and falsifications, all of which are familiar to the writer describing the period as truths and nothing but truths.
The Cellar: An Escape
Right from the beginning I isolated myself far too much in Nathal and not only did nothing to counter this isolation but actually promoted it, consciously or unconsciously, to the point of utter despair.… On the other hand, after a few days in Vienna I have to flee to Nathal to avoid suffocating in the loathsome Viennese air.… Every other week I flee from Nathal to Vienna and then from Vienna to Nathal, with the result that I have become a restless character who is driven back and forth between Vienna and Nathal in order to survive.
Wittgenstein’s Nephew




Bernhard himself was not a drinker, his brother explained, but placed the best brands of sherry and vermouth in every room. He hated hunting and hunters. Yet an armoire at the top of a landing is stocked on one side with sherries and vermouths, and on the other with a hunter’s wardrobe, numerous identical dark green sweaters, jackets, and trousers. In case of a World War III, Dr. Fabjan said. Not to mention Bernhard’s prodigious supply of shoes. Thomas’s shoe tic, his brother said. Bernhard hung a rifle from the curtain rod of his bedroom. Of course this was—nur Schmuck, just decoration, his brother made clear. He was afraid of this instrument!

Every sitting or living or sleeping room has a record player. The 1981 CBS Masterworks recording of the Goldberg Variations played by Glenn Gould sits predictably, but thrillingly, on top of a couple of other LPs in a sitting room. It is virtually a staging of the end of The Loser, in which Bernhard endowed a fictional version of the misanthropic pianist with his own autobiographical traits: I asked Franz to leave me alone in Wertheimer’s room for a while and put on Glenn’s Goldberg Variations, which I had seen lying on Wertheimer’s record player, which was still open.
----Taylor

Bernhard, who mocked the visiting of places associated with writers as well as admiration journeys to museums and churches, had done nothing less than design a museum for admirers like us to visit, in the same way that he devoted his life singlemindedly to writing even though the writings we possess are only nonsense because they can only be nonsense. Bernhard’s house is part and parcel of his literary legacy: a seriously satirical stance that eludes the initial urge to peg him as a misanthrope, a pessimist, or a nihilist.
-----Taylor

The truth is that I have always hated the Viennese coffeehouses because in them I am always confronted with people like myself, and naturally I do not wish to be everlastingly confronted with people like myself, and certainly not in a coffeehouse, where I go to escape from myself. Yet it is here that I find myself confronted with myself and my kind. I find myself insupportable, and even more insupportable is a whole horde of writers and brooders like myself. I avoid literature whenever possible, because whenever possible I avoid myself, and so when I am in Vienna I have to forbid myself to visit the coffeehouses, or at least I have to be careful not to visit a so-called literary coffeehouse under any circumstances whatever. However, suffering as I do from the coffeehouse disease, I feel an unremitting compulsion to visit some literary coffeehouse or another, even though everything within me rebels against the idea.—Wittgenstein’s Nephew

Of Bernhard’s commandingly assertive diatribes against existence, the only real content is their existence as liberating acts of self-cancellation and exaggeration. Bernhard’s own project was to rehearse not only every possible Bernhard thought but also every possible Bernhard counterthought, acknowledging that we are mistaken if we believe we are in possession of the truth, just as we are mistaken if we believe we are in error. Bernhard’s preoccupation with death and suicide and the absolute meaninglessness of existence—it is the energy generated by his fervent determination to overcome them that makes Bernhard’s literature the most life-affirming literature of all.

*
We must take care to turn this world, which was a given world but not made for us or ready for us, a world which is all set in any case, because it was made by our predecessors, to attack us and ruin us and finally destroy us, nothing else, we must turn it into a world to suit our own ideas, acting first behind the scenes, inconspicuously, but then with all our might and quite openly, so that we can say after a while that we’re living in our own world, not in some previous world…
—Correction

And so for my work—everyone has his needs—it is supremely important to be in a country whose language I do not understand, because I always have the sensation that people are saying only pleasant things and speaking only of important, philosophical things. Whereas when you’re at home and understand the language, you feel that people are saying only absolute nonsense, no? Thus the nonsense, in Spanish, becomes philosophical for me.
—Interview, 1981
Everything is ridiculous when one thinks of death, he said upon receiving Austria’s Förderungspreis für Literature in 1968

February 1, 2010   Conducive to Thinking About
quote
I doesn't have to be a hospital, he said, a prison will do just as well, perhaps even a monastery.  Prisons and monasteries are not really any different from hospitals.  . . .  Now that I was over the worst, I too had an opportunity to see my spell in the hospital as a time spent in an atmosphere conducive to thinking.  . . .  The sick, he said, are the ones who have real clarity of vision; no one else sees the world so clearly.
unquote
---Thomas Bernhard, Breath: A Decision (in Gathering Evidence: 237)
February 2, 2010     Spring Sorrow
“Especially on fair days, when the air has a particular transparency and nature is lovely for its tranquility alone, one sorrows for the dead with redoubled force.
The essential elements of a person, my father said, come to light only when we must regard him as lost to us, when everything he has done seems to have been a taking leave of us.  Suddenly the true nature of everything about himthat was merely preparation for his ultimate death becomes truly visible.”
--Thomas Bernhard, Gargoyles 16-17

Books As Battle
The isn’t just a battle for dollars. This is a losing war for the hearts and minds of our customers, for the folks that we know by sight, and that Amazon knows better by algorithm. Most booksellers aren’t out to make a killing or a dime. We’re trying to make a living, sure—but by putting the best of what we know in your hands. The best of our friends and customers ask often how business is, and the majority of us can only shrug. There is a time when the bookseller needs to stop his and her panicked breeziness about the state of affairs and tell our customers, point blank, the truth. Business isn’t good, and let me tell you: spending money is a political act, a ballot cast for the kind of world you want to live in. There is no right or wrong answer, but if you don’t shop locally, in the real world, there won’t be one left when you step outside.
- Jeff Waxman   Manager of an Indie bookstore in Chicago---this from the website Three Percent
Email prose poem (found) from Jeffrey Herrick
As for Tanizaki, I suggest you try The Makioka Sisters.  He could be quite heavy-handed, but the artistry of this novel is comparable to that of Mann's Buddenbrooks or Lawrence's The Rainbow.  The original title, "sasameyuki, " indicates the subtlety of his hand here.  It can be translated as "powder snow," but you need to know that that is a real rarity here, where snow is usually slushy.  You also need to know that "sasame" refers to a whispered conversation, most likely between a man and a woman, and most likely sad.  I guess that the translator or publisher decided there was no way to get all that across; the title itself would have to become a haiku, perhaps.
I wonder if this finds you surrounded by powder snow.  If so, I hope it' s not whispering sadly.
Best regards,
Jeffrey

February 3, 2010
Internet Addiction not so new, nor brainless health care professionals
Hotel Vöterl, Salzburg, where Thomas Bernhard was sent to recover from an illness; it was then a hospital for lung disease patients and so it was there he contracted lung disease, which he died of years later, at age 58.
"Hence the question I repeatedly asked myself was whether or not the doctors who had sent me there were really as brainless, base, and irresponsible as I had often been forced to conclude.  As was subsequently shown, they were every bit as brainless, base, and irresponsible as that, in that they had sent a young person who was fighting to regain his health not to a place where he would be cured but virtually to his death."
“I also rediscovered an urge to read the newspapers, and though I at once found myself repelled by them, this did not prevent me from reding them daily:  even at that time I had developed an addiction (a life-long addiction, as it turned out) to the mechanical routine of getting hold of newspapers and reading them--only to be unfailingly repelled by them.  Like my grandfather, who had a life-long loathing for newspapers just as intense as mine, I fell prey to this incurable newspaper disease.”   268  Gathering Evidence

February 6, 2010      Writing and shamelessness
“The writer is always devoid of shame.  Only a person who has no shame is qualified to take hold of sentences and bring them out and throw them down.  Only the most shameless writer is authentic.  But that too is a delusion, like everything else.”
Bernhard, Evidence 303

February 8, 2010     Bernhard's Song
Bernhard's five-part memoir--Gathering Evidence---is one of the most intense books I have ever read.  Having read four or five of his novels now and a few good books about him and his work, done my homework, I finally have "gotten" how to get into him and how to hear his voice.   This memoir is not literally a memoir but it is more so that than his plays (not available in English) or his novels.  He tells about his life growing up and most of it, apparently, is true, with some embellishments and contradictions, slightly differing versions of some people and events.  And he warns us directly about all of this throughout, emphasizing every so often how impossible the truth is to tell, how misleading even dishonest all talking is, all writing.  How everything fails, everything oppresses, nothing matters.
I found myself remembering the great speech Edmund makes in Eugene O'Neill's Long Day's Journey Into Night.  Edmund says at one point that we must be drunken with wine, women and song,  but always drunken.  An old motif for sure, but Bernhard does it, turning his dark bitterness into a harrowing music, beautiful, terrible, sad, and as disturbing and memorable as any music can be.
He did survive by the time he turned twenty the great sufferings of war, death, illness, medical mistreatment, isolation, every sort of loss.   The timing of certain events added to the horrors of their sheer occurrence.  His grandfather, whom he was closest to, died while Bernhard was learning that he had himself contracted tuberculosis, and then his mother tells him she has cancer and dies shortly thereafter at the age of forty-six.  He never knew his father and longed to find out more about him.  The one woman who could tell him these things was killed in a freak auto accident just days before they were to meet.  These kinds of things---all through the book.  It makes you feel terrible, horrified, appalled, at what happens, at what people do, at how impossible it is to comprehend things.  The experience of reading Bernhard is like no other and impossible to convey.
And yet the voice which Bernhard created with which to tell these things never sounds like the voice of the victim that came to the fore in so many other books about terrible lives in the second half of the twentieth century.  No wisp of victimology, of maudlin emotion.  Bernhard despairs, condemns, rages, excoriates, describes, tells and he repeats and re-states, he finds ways to darken the music of the telling so that sentimentality gets wrung out and dry wit, cold humor, bare radiance and the rhythms of pure song hold us in its grip.

February 12, 2010    The disgrace of humorless clichés
Martin Amis in an interview in Prospect magazine which I must have found online somewhere disses Bernhard I think for having no paragraph breaks but admits he has not read him so I thereby know that Amis doesn't know how funny Bernhard really is.  But he attacks Coetzee for being humorless and I wholly approve of him for doing that. 
Yet there are whole reputations built on not being funny. Who’s that German writer doesn’t even have paragraph breaks?
TC: I don’t know him, I don’t tend to read that kind of German writer.
MA: Coetzee, for instance—his whole style is predicated on transmitting absolutely no pleasure.
TC: Do you admire his books at all?
MA: No. I read one and I thought, he’s got no talent. The denial of the pleasure principle has a lot of followers. But I am completely committed to it, to pleasure.
--------
Greek Wealth Today  
On the radio and tv all this week, news from Europe about how unwilling Germany and France might or might not be to bail out almost bankrupt Greece, and maybe some other Euro nations too big to fail and too small to count well enough to balance their books.
In Borders this afternoon this magazine caught my eye  Greek Rich List.
It was in a plastic wrapper, like so many magazines these days, and had a big price under the published in UK line.  So I wrote down the name to remember it.  Here is how they describe themselves online---
The Official Publication Profiling the World’s Wealthiest Greeks.
Greek Rich List Magazine is the official publication profiling the World’s wealthiest Greeks and Greek Cypriots with accounts of their rise to success. It is an annual luxury lifestyle magazine with 116 pages, hundreds of profiles, photographs, special features, interviews and articles from renowned authors and journalists.
The concept of our publications is to celebrate and document entrepreneurial stories; to inspire young entrepreneurs and to promote Greek heritage and culture.
So intriguing.  There is some story behind the headlines here, some story behind the story, behind the magazine.  Who are these people?  What Business School did they graduate from?  The London School?  Wharton?
Do other wealthy people tend to ignore the Greeks?  Are they not included in inner talks at Davos?  Is this a coffee table magazine designed precisely for distribution at something like Davos?
Long range concern---should I still consider a trip to Greece in a few years?
February 14
Old News
Quote
Politics is a stone tied around literature's neck, and in less than six month's, it sinks under the weight.  Politics set among the imagination's concerns is like a pistol shot fired at a concert.  The noise mangles without energizing. . . . "If your characters don't talk politics," responded the publisher, "they'll cease to be the Frenchmen of 1830, and your book will no longer the the mirror, as you claim it is . . . ."
Unquote
Stendahl, The Red and the Black 361
And a few pages later:  "All I can see is candidates paying court to dirt-covered majorities."

February 14
I like the Olympics ok but find it pretty fun that 3Quarksdaily sent us to this hit of skepticism from the Roman physician, Galen, who died around 200 AD.
quote
All natural blessings are either mental or physical, and there is no other category of blessing. Now it is abundantly clear to everyone that athletes have never even dreamed of mental blessings. To begin with, they are so deficient in reasoning powers that they do not even know whether they have a brain. Always gorging themselves on flesh and blood, they keep their brains soaked in so much filth that they are unable to think accurately and are as mindless as dumb animals.
Perhaps it will be claimed that athletes achieve some of the physical blessings. Will they claim the most important blessing of all: health? You will find no one in a more treacherous physical condition... Their sleep is also immoderate. When normal people have ended their work and are hungry, athletes are just getting up from their naps. In fact, their lives are like those of pigs, except that pigs do not overexert or force feed themselves...
I think that it has become abundantly clear that the practice of athletics has no utility in the real business of life. You would further learn that there is nothing worth mention in such practice if I tell you the myth some talented man put into words. It goes like this: if Zeus decided that all the animals should live in harmony and partnership, and the herald invited to Olympia not only men but also animals to compete in the stadium, I think that no man would be crowned. In the dolichos the horse will be the best, the stadion will belong to the hare, and the gazelle will be first in the diaulos. Wretched men, nimble experts, none of you would be counted in the footraces. Nor would any of you descendants of Herakles be stronger than the elephant or the lion. I think that the bull would be crowned in the pyx and the donkey would, if he decided to enter, win the kicking crown...
This myth shows quite nicely that athletic strength does not reside in human training. And yet, if athletes cannot be better than animals in strength, what other blessing do they share in?
Perhaps someone will say that they have a blessing in the pleasure of their bodies. But how can they derive any pleasure from their bodies if during their athletic years they are in constant pain and suffering, not only because of their exercises but also because of their forced feedings? And when they reach the age of retirement, their bodies are essentially if not completely crippled.
Are athletes perhaps to be worshipped like kings because they have large incomes? Yet they are all in debt, not only during the time they are competing but also after retirement.
--Galen, Exhortation for Medicine 9-14; A 215

February 15 2010
Spiraling Onward and Ever Upward
I love it when I hear tales of the power of literary study.  A student just read The Happiness Hypothesis, so I looked up the book.  Jonathan Haidt.  Here is the Biography he has posted on Amazon.
"A strange path led me to write the Happiness Hypothesis. It all started with an existential crisis in high school -- after reading "Waiting for Godot" I became convinced there was no meaning to life. So I majored in philosophy in college, which was of little help. Then I went to graduate school in psychology, where I began to study morality and culture. Then I did post-doctoral research in anthropology (including 3 months in India), then a year of research in health psychology. It felt like meandering at the time, but every period of these travels contributed many ideas to The Happiness Hypothesis, which ends with an answer to the question: What is the meaning of life?"
"I'm now an associate professor of psychology at the University of Virginia -- an idyllic university founded by Thomas Jefferson. My next projects will involve taking the insights about balance and virtue that I came to while writing the Happiness Hypothesis, and applying them to the American culture wars. I am conducting research that may help liberals and conservatives to understand each other -- and why both sides are necessary for the health of our democracy."
(Aside to high school teachers:  I wish you would not teach Beckett in high school, even in AP, but then I also wish you would stop teaching Tuesdays With Morrie, too.)
On the Wiki site for his work I see the following:
"Haidt found that Americans who identified as liberals tended to value care and fairness higher than loyalty, respect, and purity. Self-identified conservative Americans valued care and fairness less, and the remaining three values more. Both groups gave care the highest over-all weighting, but conservatives valued fairness the lowest, whereas liberals valued purity the lowest."
Sounds like the Myers-Briggs TI all over again, doesn't it?  Or: how do you rebuild your life after having read Beckett?  Since these days I am deep into being drunk on a Beckett-like author, Bernhard, I do take note that once I finish Bernhard and my life falls apart once more, I will turn, as indeed I have so often done in the past, to Haidt and similar writers to re-find the counterbalancing traditions.
In fact I am tempted to take Haidt's either/or and turn it into a Möbius Loop and claim that there is the supreme aesthetic theory that explains and embraces all other lesser aesthetic theories.  The great artists and writers figure out ways, old ways, new ways, ways that seem new when we need new, ways that seem old when he hunker for the old, to give us all points on the Möbius Loop of judgments so that for the brief time that we are experiencing their works---we can be liberalconservative and conservativeliberal all at once.
It is a hopeless cause, however, because Jung and Myers showed us that most people, most as in 97%, cannot live for long in such oxygen deprivation systems.  They require the certainty of clear judgment, where do I stand, which, indeed, my students have been complaining about for all thirty some years of my teaching career.  I am a slow learner, the slowest, it seems.  I should have been a moutain climber.  Maybe I would have been even happier than I am now, which is pretty happy, all things considered.  Darn, I wish that phrase had not been co-opted by radio.
It passes the time, though, as Didi and Gogo have said.

“The more shocked he was by the prince’s absurdities, the more he despised himself for not admiring them, and the more miserable he judged himself for not sharing them.  Self-loathing can go no further.”
Stendahl, The Red and the Black, Burton Raffel trans. 377

February 16
Fiction and News
We often note how gruesome the news on the tv channel out of northern Vermont can be.  Drugs, thefts, domestic violence, murders, farmers’ suicides, generally desperate stuff belying the idyllic image of back-country Vermont life.  Northern New England can be pretty desperate, economically depressed in lots of the pockets in between the ski resorts, zen retreats and arts compounds.  Last week a retired middle school teacher who had been highly regarded apparently was arrested and convicted of having a collection of child pornography that the judge announced to the press was the worst he had ever seen.
This week I’m reading Thomas Bernhard some more and come upon this passage:
Then he began talking about the school teacher, the first person he had visited that morning, who had died under his hands.  The fate of the country schoolteachers was bitter, he said.  So often they came from a town, no matter how small a one, where they felt easy, into a grim mountain community where everyone was hostile to them.  Such transfers were usually made as a punishment.  The teachers would lead a more and more wretched, depressed life, all the more hamstrung by the hateful regulations issued by the Ministry of Education.  Most of them lapsed fairly soon into an apathy that might at any moment turn to madness.  In any case they were people all too prone to regard life as a penance.  But now, constantly in surroundings where they were not taken seriously, looked down on by everyone, their initially weak intellects were torn to shreds and they stumbled into sexual aberrations.
---Bernhard, Gargoyles 53 (1967; 1970)

February 16  In which the author may be permitted to glimpse the future greatness of his work
Julien has been copying love letters written by someone else and trying to use them to his purpose.
"It was the contrast between the surface frivolity of his conversation, and the letters' profound, almost apocalyptic sublimity, that made him stand out.
The length of his sentences, above all, pleased the marshall's widow:  this was not the hopping and jumping style made fashionable by Voltaire, that terribly immoral man!
Although our hero did everything he could, striving to eliminate any good sense from his conversation, it still struck notes of antimonarchism and impiety, nor did that escape Madame de Fervaques's notice.
Surrounded as she was by eminently moral people who often passed an entire evening without having a single idea, the lady was deeply impressed by something that seemed novel, though at the same time she considered it her duty to herself to be offended.
She termed these radical notions a lack of judgment, bearing the stamp of the era's frivolity."
After this delightful paragraph, (I have broken it into parts for emphasis) Stendahl gives us fair warning about just where we are.  Almost a Modernist touch, even a post-modernist foreshadowing---just to strain the idea too far.
"But frequenting drawing rooms like hers is only useful when there's something you want to ask for.  The boredom of that meaningless life, as Julien was living it, is surely shared by the reader.  These are the barren moors and heaths of our journey."
--The Red and the Black: 397.
Yes, of course I may be boring you, dear reader, Stendhal seems to be saying, but deal with it.   Almost with supreme confidence, isn't it.  As though he is also thinking to himself---you will deal with it and bear with me,  dear reader, for after all, you have made it this far,  page 397 and the end, page 524, is in sight, to you, reader, if not, yet, to me, and yet we both know that this is a great book, will become a great book, and we are both of us now in thrall to it and we must both push on.

February 17  Discipline Rewarded
"He was afraid of seeing Mathilde's vanity awakened.  Drunk with love and sensual ecstasy, he forced himself to say nothing.
As far as I'm concerned, reader, this is one of the finest traits of his character.  Anyone capable of compelling himself to make such an effort can go far--si fata sinat, if the fates grant it."
Stendhal, R&B 407

February 17   Wal-Mart and Fez
We go to Wal-Mart, a Super Wal-Mart, at least five times a week.  In the winter it is the nearest largest enclosed space in which to walk for exercise.  Virginia likes to stimulate her damaged left arm and hand by holding them onto the handle of the shopping cart and walking with the cart.
Not every time but very often when I am wandering around Wal-Mart while Virginia is racking up steps on her pedometer for the day, I think of our visit to the great Medina of Fez, Morocco in 1998.  We were there only two nights and we visited the Medina only one afternoon under the protection of our guide who walked us all around explaining everything.  Then I thought of Wal-Mart and back home, even more than ten years later, when in Wal-Mart I recall the wholly medieval market of Fez.

February 20, 2010
A quiet Saturday in February
and photographing the washcloth seems just the thing to do.
We went to a gallery opening last night.  That might explain it.  Wondering when the need to paint will finally overwhelm all other actions and intentions and plans for the day and cause the setting up of the studio in the empty space here in the room to the right of this MacBook station under the skylight.
Not yet.  Photographing the towel racks earlier today seemed to do the trick.
For now.

February 28

Here's the root base of the big tree that blew down across Rogers Street Thursday night.  Violent rain and wind.  No power when we woke.  We spent the next two nights at a motel just outside of town.  Sunday, today, I took these photos of the NH Electric Co-op crews working.  They had to replace some destroyed poles at the base of the hill, on Langdon Street.

No comments:

Post a Comment